pull down to refresh

One of my personal opinions on this is:
  • No matter if they exist, this debate is tiring because most teams would rather need a 5th Junior person doing quantitative stuff
  • This debate underminds how insane the progress of two good engineers can be if they have the freedom to bounce ideas between them.
  • And this "10x" debate seems to overrate coders that are genuinely just good slightly over average but again worse than hiring two people.
  • Founders who can't code or recruiters have no effing idea who "10x" engineers really are. They're wasting money on the wrong people because of this debate