Yes but nobody's going to put serious effort into writing software for a bootleg reverse-engineered API that can be vanished at any time with no reputational consequences for the site.
Come on guys. Man up. Free the WOT!
reply
two people already started
Also, I just remembered that @elvismercury was playing around with the GraphQL playground here
Isn't this already like a public, documented API?
You can even use it from your browser, lol
So at least the argument that you have to reverse-engineer it no longer holds
bootleg reverse-engineered API that can be vanished at any time with no reputational consequences for the site.
I think you just answered your own question:
Why doesn't Stacker News have one?
This, lol
This site has no documented public API because... I'm sure you'll be able to guess :)
Or should I say no API that is documented in the form one might expect when they hear "documented API" :)