pull down to refresh
I said opt-in
reply
Apologies, I read it the other way. I took it as a user opting-in to contributing to funding. I should have known better.
reply
pull down to refresh
I said opt-in
Apologies, I read it the other way. I took it as a user opting-in to contributing to funding. I should have known better.
It sounds like there might be slight rug-pull risk with founding a territory. Was that intended?
If I put up 100K sats monthly for say 20 months, then the rules change, and you let somebody else buy a fraction of the 21 st months' revenue...that seems like a violation of property rights.
On the other hand, if a territory founder has the option but not the obligation to accept additional financial contributions...then that seems like a better pattern.