pull down to refresh

Might the corn grown in the Midwest (which has either just minimal drought, or no drought) be made available to the ranchers in the areas suffering drought to feed their herds?
Nope!!! It's going to be used for additional ethanol production -- beyond that which it normally would!!
Normally E15 is banned in the summer months due to the fact that burning it increases smog. In the name of reducing atmospheric emissions of a non-pollutant—the CO2 emitted from burning gasoline—the president is waiving longstanding anti-pollution regulations to allow increased smog this summer.
reply
The only way things make sense is if you understand that they want you dead.
Until we understand and accept that as fact, we will do nothing to prevent them from continuing to try to kill us.
reply
"When countries import food, they're not actually importing food so much as they're importing water. When you import a ton of wheat you're actually importing a thousand tons of water. Cause that's how much water it takes to grow and process a ton of wheat."
Half of the water [from the Colorado River Basin] goes to grow feed for livestock and cattle.
reply
This is the link he was getting the visualization / data from, pretty wild.
reply
Nice find!!
reply
Long term there is no way around large scale seawater desalination imo. The middle east does it successfully for years now.
But in the short there there are lot's of things to improve before that. The misallocation you mentioned is a prime example for that.
reply
Well, in California they could build additional reservoirs in the Northern part of the state to hold water that currently is far in excess of what they have the capacity to store, and goes into the Pacific as a result. It's an anti-growth state, and attempts to look at building more reservoirs has been shot down due to protest from environmentalists. For example, the push to build the Sites reservoir started over a dozen years ago, and has gone nowhere: https://norcalwater.org/efficient-water-management/sites-reservoir/
In central California, there are underground storage basins. The concern is that this has been possible only through Saudi investment.
But whether doing this for continued irrigation of crops makes sense, I'm not the expert to say that. I suspect some areas, particularly those using water from the Colorado rivers, will see less agriculture.
In the Great Plains, there is a minimal amount of aquifer recharge happening. There's potential for a canal (with a lot of pumping), to move water from where there's way more than enough to where they draw from the aquifers.
I've no idea what happens next with that. The current political climate would rather have us learn to eat the bugs than to see water resources go to increasing production for us meat eaters.
reply