54 sats \ 14 replies \ @TomK OP 28 Dec 2023 \ parent \ on: Ethiopia defaulted on its USD debt news
Wait for the shitcoin(s) the BRICS will be using. I don't get the euphoria if You see the digital Yuan and its social control mechanism behind it. Who the hell will prefer this crap over the USD?
yeah, no.
First off, you know the US' propaganda has a clear track record of claiming others do what it it actually doing. this is the same thing. It yells about that while the US is actually surveying banks, closing accounts for politically uncouth activity. Or Canada. (You know nobody in China, right? There is no social credit system. Nobody in China has the slightest idea what you're on about if you mention this. They have credit scores, but they're no more invasive then the credit score data vacuum the US has.)
And second, and more importantly, the BRICS are not planning a end-user currency. The basket currency is made as a base-layer international trade bookkeeping currency, nothing the people in the member states will use.
BRICS is not that integrated and has no desire to be; the base layer rule in BRICS is national sovereignty and self-determination, for clear historical reasons of all involved, they have all at one point been at the receiving end of Western imperialism.
You already figured out Western countries lying to you about everything from inflation to Ukraine. They're lying about this as well. For much the same reasons.
reply
You're right with the wholesale currency. But you're completely off the rails if You think that there is more surveillance in the US than in China. That's sbsurd.
reply
The US banned Huawei because it could't control chip production and therefore not mandate backdoor surveillance equipment in hardware. Privacy conscious people use huawei BECAUSE of this, while the US is trying to tell us hauwei is the security risk. lmao.
The US national security state is an absolute information vaccum. Has been for 25 years. We KNOW this, there are tons of whistleblowers who told us, from Assange and Snowden on. this is documented.
China has allegations cooked up by the US. Are they surveilling stuff? Of course they are. More than the US? Hardly possible, and there is no equivalent proof in that direction, in any case.
reply
Watch the foreign capital movement out of China in recent months. Then ask Yourself: where would You put Your life savings (if btc wouldn't exist)? And don't tell me You would prefer China of the US.
reply
you realize you just changed the subject because you realize I know things you don't. :)
And of course I wouldn't put my savings into China. I'd never get it out, it has capital controls.
Don't mistake me for an ideologue. I'm not here to talk up or down anything with some religious zeal. I just care about knowing things before judging them, and then, the black and white pattern fades away.
reply
So Dr. ''I know it all'': what do You know about China? Do You have some insights about the libertarian government that is running the most liberal society on earth?
reply
I'd love to hear more about this whole idea, "there's really no social credit score in China".
I listened to a podcast some time ago, where the interviewee made the same point. I can't remember details though, and would be interested in hearing more, and also who, specifically, is promoting the story, if it's not true.
reply
maybe you saw brian berletic? it's here:
always hard to say who exactly, but it's part if a pattern known as "atrocity propaganda", where one side tries to spread dehumanizing horror stories about supposed crimes that portray an enemy as an animalistic uncivilized terror. it's old, it's been around in WW1, but today you see it against hamas, russia, iran, china, among many others. it was used against serbia, afghanistan, lybia in the past, anyone really who the US wanted to discredit.
reply
Very interesting, thanks for the pointer to Brian Berletic.
You know, I think this whole concept, that the CCP social credit score story is propaganda, is really interesting and worthy of a top-level post. Specifically because it's one of the items that's often brought up by people who are, often, our ideological friends. People who hate the idea of a social credit score.
reply
Hello and thanks again. I think what we can say is that the world is in a surveillance race and a battle to outdo each other. We have known this at least since Edward Snowden that the west has also fallen into this trap. What the article does tone down, however, is the fact that in my opinion China has taken the lead in this race and is being used by the west as a shield and line of argument to introduce the same surveillance systems, if not more stringent ones, as in the european union. And that's why the observation that the western media is playing the game of western politics and exaggerating the Chinese surveillance system is completely correct. What i knew was that a variety of different credit scoring systems similar to ours existed. What I had assumed and that doesn't seem to be the case yet, you're absolutely right, is the bundling and centralization of all this data. Whether this is the long-term goal: i think so. But it won't be any different for us. All in all, bad times are dawning. Thanks again for the article which put everything into perspective a bit. greetings
reply
Yeah, bad times are dawning. I've already moved to the global south, at least there nobody bothers me to pay with cards and payment systems.
reply
Thank You, I will watch the video this morning. But before I'll do this keep in mind that the other side has its own propaganda department
reply
In general, I'm aware that absolutely everything "formal" I consume was made by someone with an institutional connection, and thus under the pressure and structural limits imposed by these institutions. Sometimes that's dependence on local governments, like any mainstream media corporation ("private" corporate networks don't exist without being in the good graces of the governments that license them, give them access to sources, etc.); sometimes that's a social media platform that can block and ban them; sometimes it's an audience they depend on for monetization, so they can't go against the hard preconceptions of that audience or lose subscribers that pay their rent. Often it's some combination of those three. You might call that skepticism a hermeneutics of suspicion.
And it's especially useful when it comes to the designated enemies of the day. I always find it useful to remember: I don't speak Russian, Chinese, or Korean, Farsi or Arabic. I have little access to internal stories there. What I get is from mostly Western sources with their interests, and I generally assume 100% of what Western media (and politics, and school) tells me about Russia, Iran, China, North Korea, Zimbabwe, El Salvador, Nicaragua, etc. - anyone who goes against them - is a bold, dirty lie until proven otherwise. I recommend this stance to everyone.
I have some friends in some of these places I trust who can help me put things into perspective; that's a privilege, but they're all still trapped in the frames of their upbringings and are also not immune to all this. (I always remember that I wouldn't trust 90% of people in MY country when they try to explain something about that very country to me... but at least with friends,. I KNOW their preconceptions and can adjust for them. Also, they're critical, resistant souls, they're my friends, after all, and I picked them that way.)
You have to assemble it and see what sticks. And you still can't really know.
That said, it's also good to remember that "that's propaganda!" is the usual rallying cry OF propaganda against everything that goes against it. "flak" is what Chomsky calls it. And while your country has you surrounded with school, media, politics, and everyday conversation culture all reinforcing its propaganda, "foreign" one has to break through, sneak in, and when it does, goes against everything you've learnt.
Which is to say: the people propagandizing you are usually your own, the other side has much, much less access to you. Or, with another quote: Always remember your main enemy is in your own country.
reply
Controlling governments.
reply