pull down to refresh
816 sats \ 3 replies \ @om 29 Dec 2023
I agree with some of that, most importantly that ZK-proofs are awesome.
I also disagree with some of that, most importantly with FIVE ninja turtles on the picture.
reply
677 sats \ 2 replies \ @cryotosensei 29 Dec 2023
Could you enlighten me about the integration of zero-knowledge proofs into Bitcoin? Do you think it’s an innovative move or plain unnecessary?
reply
986 sats \ 1 reply \ @om 29 Dec 2023
Bitcoin has all sorts of lightweight clients that have to trust their parent nodes. This trust can be removed with zk-proofs. See one such project: #256267
I hope to see more of that, for example watchtowers that can prove to you that your lightning channel is not being closed or SPV wallets that can prove to you that you haven't received a payment.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @cryotosensei 30 Dec 2023
Thank you for your insight. I love learning something new
reply
776 sats \ 7 replies \ @gunson 29 Dec 2023
Still reading, but this quote is revealing:
It shows how he thinks about decentralisation being about the ability of a project to continue once it's developers retire, and not as resistance to state-level attacks. Gets to the heart of why there's such a significant divide between earnest Bitcoin and Ethereum people.
reply
269 sats \ 0 replies \ @elvismercury 29 Dec 2023
I haven't read it, but the latter is a prerequisite for the former.
reply
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @kman2140 29 Dec 2023
A podcast with an Eth maxi and a Bitcoin maxi would be so good.
reply
164 sats \ 4 replies \ @orthwyrm 29 Dec 2023
These are never good TBH.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @shyfire 29 Dec 2023
deleted by author
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @elvismercury 29 Dec 2023
Do you have a link? I haven't run across this.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @orthwyrm 29 Dec 2023
With Justin Drake?
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @shyfire 29 Dec 2023
deleted by author
reply
575 sats \ 1 reply \ @BitcoinIsTheFuture 29 Dec 2023
He’s sold the top twice with the Etherium foundation and laughed about it. Running an unregistered security, I think he ends up in prison.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Eobard 29 Dec 2023
deleted by author
reply
231 sats \ 0 replies \ @inverselarp 29 Dec 2023
He always had strong SBF vibes. Bullshit on top of bullshit covered with pipe dream ideals. I actually respect bunch of people in ETH land but Vitalik is not one of them.
reply
187 sats \ 0 replies \ @south_korea_ln 29 Dec 2023 freebie
Good old Vitalik... my 2 favorite descriptions:
-
Vitalik, closeted bitcoin maxi.
-
Vitalik, what a smart person should look like according to a dumb person.
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @POTUS 29 Dec 2023
Imagine thinking etherium was ever cypherpunk lol
reply
42 sats \ 0 replies \ @jk_14 29 Dec 2023
https://imgprxy.stacker.news/O8Px0CQuQyfoNXNpwaMbcqW62qYJU81oUVqWELRd6JU/rs:fit:2560:1440/aHR0cHM6Ly9pLnBvc3RpbWcuY2MvanFOczRoVzMvb2stc2hpdGNvaW5lci5naWY
reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Neo 29 Dec 2023
TL;DR
ETH CEO - Looks for a new narrative, to attract more exit liquidity.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @btcs 24 Sep
Ethereum is a scam
reply
0 sats \ 10 replies \ @garyKrause_ 29 Dec 2023
Off topic post. Plz downzap
reply
281 sats \ 9 replies \ @shyfire 29 Dec 2023
deleted by author
reply
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @garyKrause_ 29 Dec 2023
Territory**
And you didn't read the deacription then.
reply
0 sats \ 7 replies \ @shyfire 29 Dec 2023
deleted by author
reply
21 sats \ 6 replies \ @garyKrause_ 30 Dec 2023
Top of the territory. "Territory Details"
reply
10 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 30 Dec 2023
Posting about cryptocurrencies is fine here. As long as it's really about them and not mainly about aspects around them.
See this comment from me:
And this post is at least focusing on Ethereum and not on trading Ethereum or something. And it also includes some interesting crypto:
But I agree. It's not an easy or clear distinction. This post however was indeed interesting. Unlike other posts about which are more like "crypto news".
I guess I need to update the territory description to at least try to make this more clear.
reply
392 sats \ 3 replies \ @arrivederci 6 Feb
Why wasn't the territory just named Cryptography then ?
Seems to me that calling it crypto but with the description you have given just adds to the (unhelpful) conflation of 'cryptocurrencices' (dumb name) and cryptography.
I get the idea of 'trying to take a name back' but I don't think crypto was ever used much as an abbreviation for cryptography much anyway. (Although maybe I'm wrong and it was in some circles ?) I feel the use of the word mostly sprang into existence with the arrival of shitcoining 'crypto bros'.
reply
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 6 Feb freebie
See posts linked in the territory description
This
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 30 Dec 2023 freebie
Updated the description. Let me know what you think:
https://m.stacker.news/9988
was running out of characters, lol
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @sudocarlos 29 Dec 2023
Meanwhile, he wrote this in September. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4563364
Cypherpunks don't work with the state to help erode digital privacy.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rsync25 29 Dec 2023
Lol
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @benthecarman 29 Dec 2023
Lmao
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @castingluxfr 7 Jan freebie
Bitcoin is the gold standard of crypto and to be the golden standard you cannot use it as payments method, it would be like carrying gold around and cutting off a tiny piece of it every time you make a purchase. I for one wont be doing that but feel free to pay me in Bitcoin, or in gold ;)
Who's with me on this?
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @faithandcredit 29 Dec 2023 freebie
VB chief triggerer of bitcoiner :)?