pull down to refresh
103 sats \ 0 replies \ @cointastical 17 Jun 2022
I just want Brave but with BTC on Lightning Network, is that too much to ask?
#26100
Brave for Bitcoiners
#13555
reply
13 sats \ 4 replies \ @EnormousPony 17 Jun 2022
Impervious AI browser seems to be the closest thing to a Bitcoin centring browser it should be available soon
reply
25 sats \ 1 reply \ @nerd2ninja 17 Jun 2022
Hmm interesting...wake me up when full release
reply
8 sats \ 0 replies \ @EnormousPony 17 Jun 2022
That's the million sats question now: when release?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Brunswick 17 Jun 2022
It'll be released right before Tesla finalizes its FSD
reply
8 sats \ 0 replies \ @EnormousPony 17 Jun 2022
Or Half life 3
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @starbuilder 17 Jun 2022
I use brave minus their token shit. There is a clear need for Web 5 (DIDs+ wallet) integrated browser. I am sure a faction within brave will fork it to make it happen...!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Majjin 17 Jun 2022
I think at one point there was a Bitcoin focused fork of Brave. It had a badger as its mascot instead of a lion. Not sure what happened to it.
reply
13 sats \ 0 replies \ @arrowdrive 17 Jun 2022
Absolutely yes. They should just give up on their shitcoin and adopt BTC over LN. Brave is a cool concept that’s held back by their shitcoin.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @MerryOscar 17 Jun 2022
@alby should build a browser
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @0268486dc4 17 Jun 2022
It originally was supposed to be built to use bitcoin.
reply
3 sats \ 0 replies \ @ideasourcing 18 Jun 2022
Yes, i stopped watching their ads, as brave is down shitton and they have 2 wallets/exchanges - gemini and uphold, both of whom have put indian users' verification on hold along with other countries. Plus gemini increased the withdrawal limit to 10x suddenly. Seems very slimy with all this Luna crap. i've been telling each and every customer care in feedback for years "use sats" to Amazon, Google. YouTube, Brave, Odysee, but they have chosen their own stupidcoins.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheBTCManual 18 Jun 2022
They should if they want to be around for a while longer, who is going to bother with its monetiation token, it just ads complexity, why would I want to advertise to people and have to jump through hoops buying a shitcoin.
they should switch to lightning it would streamline their entire process and provide way more liquidity
If am keen to see how impervious works once we can all get our hands on it
reply
27 sats \ 1 reply \ @tomlaies 17 Jun 2022
I have no interest in anything chromium whatsoever.
If I should have someone should convince me of what's better than pointing smartphone at Tor browser window qr codes.
reply
13 sats \ 0 replies \ @BeefCurtin 17 Jun 2022
Same. I would rather support Firefox even though they recently came out against PoW. Despite their opinion, I believe browser engine diversity is important and I don't want to see chromium/google have more control over the market than they already do. That is too strong of a centralizing force.
Tragic Mozilla's going to kill their browser because of stupid management decisions.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @nout 18 Jun 2022
Stacker browser? ;)
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @2bithits 18 Jun 2022
Yes
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @nerd2ninja 17 Jun 2022
Someone interested in doing that could always just fork the project ;)
reply
16 sats \ 0 replies \ @Zk2u 17 Jun 2022
Might build a WebKit-powered browser at Valera like this
reply