Part one was also shared, here on SN:
Bitcoin's first major recession: Part One | Nik Bhatia #37090 https://thebitcoinlayer.substack.com/p/bitcoins-first-major-recession-part
reply
TBL is a great newsletter - I get a kick out of paying for it with lightning once a quarter :)
On this one:
  • I find it perplexing, but unsurprising that the Fed doesn’t follow some version of the Taylor rule and maintain rates as some function of employment and inflation. I’m constantly trying to decide whether they’re incompetent or corrupt - probably both?
  • Why do the markets continue tolerating the illusion that the USD won’t eventually fail, and rather demand far higher interest to compensate for the debasement? I guess with the size of these markets there’s no where else to go besides real estate, and commodities?
  • If I was a corrupt member of the FOMC or a Fed insider I’d take money off the table (out of equity and bonds) then wait until I know policy is going to change, then go all in with some leverage and kill it on the next brrrr run. Or I’d do it with my spouse’s trading account to make it a little less obvious. (In this scenario I work for the Fed and already have no scruples)
reply
The Fed is sprinting to fight inflation. As a function of its tardiness, the Fed is willing to tighten credit as quickly as possible, not caring about slaughtering risk assets in the process. In fact, Fed officials seem to be fine with the pace of the decline given their silence on the matter of late.
The Fed’s dual mandate is to maintain full employment and stable prices. It has clearly botched the latter, and it’ll impact the former to correct it.
Bitcoin has fallen harder and faster than its traditional finance compatriots. Why? Bitcoin has very low liquidity (~$0.5 trillion in total market cap) relative to other asset classes (over ~$100 trillion in total global equities), often extremely high leverage, and no bailout lender of last resort.
We might believe in the narrative of bitcoin as a risk-off asset, but the market certainly doesn’t.
While strong correlation may be there 90% of the time, all you need is one of these major legs-up per year to achieve bitcoin’s astronomical compound growth profile. Despite prolonged regimes of strong correlation with equities, the protracted periods of extreme appreciation separate bitcoin from every other asset in history.
Bitcoin has faced 12 drawdowns of this same magnitude in its history, and yet it’s still here.
reply