pull down to refresh
52 sats \ 0 replies \ @elvismercury 2 Jan
Oh that is so interesting! As per discussion over here I wonder what the implications will be. It's a big enough deal that I could imagine companies doing some kind of legal shenanigans to incorporate over there.
reply
245 sats \ 0 replies \ @bzzzt 2 Jan
What defines training ? Crazy to me that a computer can disregard copyright but humans cant...maybe this is a stepping stone to that inevitability of copyright becoming unenforceable and pointless.
reply
245 sats \ 0 replies \ @zuspotirko 2 Jan
So Europe has the most anti-tech stance and Japan the most pro-tech stance. Let's see how this will play out.
reply
245 sats \ 0 replies \ @DeltaClimbs 2 Jan
Based. I wrote a long tweet the other day on the invalidity of patent law and suggesting El Salvador withdraw from the PCT.
https://twitter.com/GhostDirac/status/1740800046629879977
reply
24 sats \ 1 reply \ @hn OP 2 Jan
This link was posted by ashvardanian 12 minutes ago on HN. It received 68 points and 27 comments.
reply
571 sats \ 0 replies \ @tensegral 2 Jan freebie
It's worth noting a comment on HN points out that the article source is comments during a meeting from a government official.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38842788#38843025
Looking through the first source, it's not at all clear that this is policy. In fact, that meeting from April 2023 seems to indicate that current copyright protection is insufficient for AI, and new regulation is required.
The second source at the bottom of the article doesn't work for me currently.
Anyone fluent in Japanese would be a welcome commenter here.
reply