pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 5 Jan \ on: Why do people declare the LN a failure? Ask_SN
The issue of high transaction fees on the main chain is a concern, but there is not much that can be done. Bitcoin is for everyone, for good and for bad. The only problem I see with the Lightning Network is the issue of opening/closing channels. I think it is a barrier to adoption, but I also don't know of any better solution, if there is one.
write
preview
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @TNStacker 5 Jan
The world is used to custodial solutions - for everything, especially financial. I expect Alby and Wallet of Satoshi types to be around. Regulators will have a say as "the enemy gets a vote."
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 5 Jan
Yes. Custodial solutions give a big boost to the LN, but they are not ideal.

Not Your Keys, Not Your Coins

reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xBTC OP 5 Jan
so then if there isn't one, are they right?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 5 Jan
I don't think it's a matter of being wrong or right. I believe that doing your best is always a good thing, but it doesn't mean it's the best thing.
reply