pull down to refresh

I just had a similar post yesterday (that didn't get any traction) but I was thinking about it differently.
In terms of saving money/store of value - I am with you 100%. In terms of buying a house (as you have laid out in the table), I think of it the opposite way.
If I bought a home in 2018 with 100 bitcoin, the house would be worth maybe 400-500k in 2023. The bitcoin I used to buy it would be worth $4.4M. Of course the difference becomes less dramatic if I were to buy a home with bitcoin in 2023 (assuming cost of a house in 2023 is 10 bitcoin again it would still be a big loss by 2028 with btc at $250k), but I would still not make that deal.
this territory is moderated
The tables I made are definitely over simplified - can't get the same house for $300k today that you'd get 5 years ago, etc. Plus then you're paying rent or whatever in the meantime.
reply
Totally, but the principle applies. If the thing you buy something with gains value faster than the thing you bought then you are effectively losing money.
I would not make a big purchase with bitcoin today. In your example about buying bitcoin in 2018 and then buying a car in 2023, that 0.81 bitcoin used in 2023 to buy a car would be worth ~200k in 2028. Obviously one is far better off holding bitcoin than holding dollars, but it would poor financial decision to buy a car with bitcoin right now.
As a very real example, I bought SOL at $20. I sold 25 of them at like $35 to buy concert tickets. Of course I still made money with my SOL and so I effectively paid $500 for $800 tickets, but the opportunity cost of buying those tickets was a couple thousand dollars.
That is the math. Your argument is the $500 for $800 tickets. That is undoubtedly a great deal. My argument is the if i had the 25 SOL they would be worth $2500 now. Not such a great deal.
reply