Explain what you mean first. What is tailwind Bitcoin inflation?

The first thing I would say, is that inflation is a headwind, not a tailwind. On a plane, a tailwind pushes the plane faster to its destination. A headwind on the other hand, pushes it back requireing more energy to go the same pace.

Inflationary forces cause the purchasing power of each unit of account to collectively drop. A pro inflation argument only looks at number of satoshis, but the value of those satoshis going down as inflation continues, means the miners actually, in effect, are rewarded less and less as time goes on despite the number being the same.

I would prefer a different solution, such as portion of the transaction fee to return to the coinbase until a certain number is reached which might average block rewards accross less and more transaction volume times. A more smoothing out method rather than, whatever the heck this inflationary idea is.

Been reading a few tweets about it from Peter Todd. https://twitter.com/peterktodd/status/1540028889145442304

IMO if nothing is done, then we are banking on gov/big corps to do mining in the future, and with how fungibility works right now, that would be the nightmare scenario for bitcoin.

The "anti" camp (mainly NgU gang) is saying it's too far out in the future, we can wait and see, and if bitcoin isn't successful by then, it's failed already. But I am not sure how much of that is true, a resilient network requires sustainable and ideal mining conditions too.

Miners are forward looking, we don't know how many more halvening later we would seriously need a ready to implement and agreeable proposals.

I honestly feel like there's far too little well presented, discussions between bitcoiners, with good data and reference point. It makes whoever is the loudest get the say, namely those who have a lot of followers (bitcoin core dev are definitely under appreciated in this regard)