Few places to spend
reply
29 sats \ 0 replies \ @gd 19 Jan
This really is it. Even most bitcoin products don't accept BTC.
reply
deleted by author
reply
True
reply
Taxes
reply
deleted by author
reply
I agree that taxes is a big issue, but also a consequence of acquiring bitcoin from someone that treat it as a property.
The boat game always works to lose that property and get something cleaner
reply
deleted by author
reply
What was the turning point that pushed you to spend your sats?
reply
deleted by author
reply
That's a great strategy if you're still having fiat income
reply
deleted by author
reply
our circle of users is relatively small - SN, nostr clients, V4V, IRL tipping, etc.
most of us accept trade offs in UX in order to send and receive our preferred money.
BUT normies & newcoiners will not accept the same UX trade offs. we need to continue to iterate on blends of custody, functionality in order to create more intuitive, usable experiences.
i am interested to see how fedimints might be used to augment some of LN’s… quirks, esp in cases where users are holding < 50k sats in a wallet.
reply
It's a good point and well known issue. I think with time UX challenges will be face ad solved, as you mentioned, we need to iterate more.
Fedimint it's a great community tool and relay on community leaders to onboard normies. Remember that most of the people does not know which technology they are using... just a detail when the experience it's smooth. In the other end, when there's a need, there's a will to learn and use ew tools. Look at cars, no one knew how to drive before... But if you want to go from A to B faster, you'll learn
reply
i do hear your point, but IMO, if we want bitcoin to have more daily use in the west, we need to make the experience OBVIOUSLY better than how payments work currently.
subpar UX is a well-known issue, to be sure, but i personally don't see as much focus on this from western bitcoiners. fundamental bitcoin education is not as important ((in the west)) as creating amazing experiences. this is coming from a marketing/content guy.
i don't want to wait until the USD system goes tits-up for the west to realize the need; i would prefer capitalism to front run that scenario and build products and services with awesome UX. let's get creative!
reply
Ok that's interesting:
  1. what make you think that the east use more bitcoin than the west on a daily basis? Do you have any data supporting this affirmation?
  2. what do you mean for subpar UX? any link you could share?
  3. western bitcoiners? What's the difference with the eastern bitcoiners? Ca you expand on this?
  4. You're right, education is not important... it's KEY. You can create the seamless experience but if people are not willing to learn about IT and about the benefits it could offer, it will be a waste of efforts.
  5. what UX experience are you talking about specifically?
  6. I got you, it's hard to market products you do not understand
reply
I'll address the questions in the order that I think will be easiest to understand:
  1. by "western" bitcoiners, I mean folks from the USA, Canada, UK, most of EU etc. like a geopolitical "west", NATO-sympathetic countries, if you will. the difference is that western bitcoiners don't need bitcoin as a monetary system, it is moreso an investment vehicle (store-of-value) at this point in time.
  2. I am actually not making the claim that eastern daily bitcoin usage is greater than western usage -- my assertion is that, in order for western perception of bitcoin to transition from store-of-value into medium-of-exchange (and thus increase bitcoin's utility as money), we need to develop frictionless ways to use bitcoin that are OBVIOUSLY better (to normies, not us) than the incumbent system.
1 & 4. in regards your original question "what are the challenges of spending sats daily" my mind immediately went to all the issues in using lightning on a daily basis. for the specific UX issues, I wrote this article for River a few months back - most of the issues I wrote about have not yet been solved.
  1. I agree and disagree with this point.
Where I disagree: If you create a seamless experience that surpasses a fiat-based experience, you really wouldn't need to educate users. They will simply use the product or service that is most convenient and cost-effective.
Where I agree (with caveat): education is important, but it absolutely needs to be contextually relevant to the subset of users you are trying to educate. Not everyone cares about the same things that hardcore bitcoiners do.
reply
Thank you for taking the time and clearly respond point by point. For me still a bit weird that you differentiate between wester and eastern bitcoiners. True is that there's a fundamental mindset difference between the two sides, but also think there's no need to create this boundary, first because there's probably people that use bitcoin as store-of-value in the east as there's people that use bitcoin as medium-of-exchange in the west.
Moreover, please consider that the technology itself is Made in USA, so there's obviously the first-arrive-first-served here, the language has also been and still being a barrier to access bitcoin as most of the contents still being created i English. There's a lot we can do in so many aspects to help everyone globally understand this technology.
Have the expectation that UX will fix everything is not enough, and sound's like there's an expectation of things working effortlessly for you, instead of taking ownership and make things work with you. The concept of PoW apply globally too, so some effort needs to be done to get some reward, otherwise you'll still use bitcoin as you use fiat. Bitcoin is not only a store-of-value or medium-of-exchange and there's so much to do and learn to understand and apply the other characteristics and values enclosed in it.
reply
finding p2p topups to replace all the spedning
on-boarded 2 new merchants in the last 2 weeks
orange pilling is getting easier and easier these days
reply
  1. Privacy
  2. Taxes
  3. Low merchant adoption
reply
  1. self-hosting woes
  2. LN routing failures
  3. high fees for resolving 1 and 2
reply
noted
reply
High transaction fees.
I wanted to buy a product the other day, fairly expensive. The fee was supposed to be around $90.
Way to high. That product remained in the shopping cart.
reply
What's the price of the product? I mean, what was the percentage that those 90% were compared with the product price?
reply
The transaction fee was approx. 1/2 the purchase price. So like around $200 for product + shipping and an additional $90 in fees.
On chain. No lightning option.
reply
Shame on the seller not accepting LN payments. Did you find an alternative product? or you'll wait for onchain fees to go down?
reply
Waiting.
reply
Lack of merchant and retailer adoption. But we are early!
reply
Do you think there's anything that we could do? Or anything already existing that maybe need a review or push?
reply
For now, we need to be relentless, but friendly and helpful and ask vendors in our spheres. When merchants see enough people asking they will start to see.
Be prepared to share resources for getting started:
Bitcoin and Lightning Network basics.
@DarthCoin Guides:
Bitcoin has no marketing department. We are it!
Stack Sats and stay humble
reply
Education is key. but the tools I believe make the difference o onboarding merchants. The small ones, have probably some fears facing change. Accounting issues could be one. Just a guess
reply
We have to onboard more buyers first. The merchants will follow demand. They will not create the demand
reply
I live in a small city (300.000 population) and we don't have any BTC friendly business.
But, I know some bitcoiners from here, and they are more focus on staking SATS than spending. So, if we orange pille a bar or any other business no many payments on BTC will occur.
Its an issue not easy to solve.
reply
People thinking I’m a weirdo for spending my sats because they just want BTC to pump n buy fiat. Not me. I sell fiat to buy BTC!
reply
Not enough day-to-day businesses accepting
Not enough places accepting non-base chain payments
Currently the easiest way to spend ur sats in most places is to... buy fiat-denominated gift cards?
Tax bullshit
reply
Find other bitcoiners
reply
  1. The law of my country, which doesn't like cryptocurrencies at all.
  2. The number of vendors accepting crypto is very low, especially in the countryside.
  3. Automatic converters have all been shut down.
reply
Not having enough sats.
reply
22 sats \ 0 replies \ @mo 19 Jan
if you have this approach, they will never be enough!
reply
on educating people to pay me in sats:) 😳 and then also on pilling others to accept my payment in sats too.
so I need to work on both ways.
reply
We are still very early! Taxes on spent sats, limited places that accept it, and being so early value is going up exponentially. We get a hard time that people reference the white paper so much as a medium of exchange and gold and silver were used for that, but also as a store of value. I do use a lot of sats on Stacker News easily
reply
The only challenge I face everyday is me not having as much sats as I want. That is one challenge that needs national consideration.
reply
Fees.
reply
do you mean onchain fees?
reply
Main layer, layer two.
That's why - at least for now - I'm using Bitcoin as a savings account instead of a way to buy things. Simply doesn't make sense economically speaking.
reply
As a novice bitcoiner (I'm an ERС-20 follower with 1000 days on the network), I don't understand anything at all, not even the basics of where to find a SATS contract and see quotes (of course, this can be done on СoinMarketCap, but there are three versions of SATS). Again, I don't want to install a new wallet, and in general it seems more complicated to me than it was in ERC-20 (but I'm not sure).
reply
You seem to be confusing some non-Bitcoin token(s) with the native Bitcoin unit of account. Those tokens are a scam, attempting to fool people who don’t understand that a satoshi is simply the smallest unit of Bitcoin recognized by the base layer.
reply
keep learning
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @9 19 Jan
There is only one type of true Satoshi
reply
deleted by author
reply