22 sats \ 5 replies \ @iguano 30 Jun 2022 \ parent \ on: Daily discussion thread
24h seems pretty short time frame to me.
everything else sounds right :D
agree it seems kind of short and divides sats amongst a small number of individuals who might be incentivize to post more noise.
Wonder if averaging out contributions over a week might smooth things out a bit more..
reply
Why? It ties rewards directly to actions you recently made and the rewards will be much larger for the users who are rewarded.
reply
Because it force people to visit the page everyday...
I mean, sometimes a good news can be viewed and commented for more than 24h
I mean I think is a good idea to reduce the time, but 24h seems kind of rushy...
Is just an idea btw :)
reply
You don’t need to visit everyday to get your rewards. You just can’t earn rewards tomorrow if you don’t contribute today. We can adjust it as time goes on … just trying to see what we can do to incentivize better content.
Right now it rewards a long tail of mediocre content and I think that’s bad for most users.
reply
Well for sure rewarding old content is not the best approach.
reply