pull down to refresh
161 sats \ 0 replies \ @freetx 31 Jan
Ultimately I think AI should be regarded as a 2nd Amendment issue. Each person will need personal AI agents to combat the big-gov / big-tech AI agents.
Just like with 2A, the combined "firepower" of millions of individual and decentralized AI agents will be enough to keep the centralized forces in check.
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @OneOneSeven 31 Jan
How it works:
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @jasonb 31 Jan
Interesting!
reply
150 sats \ 1 reply \ @fred 31 Jan
A lot of people will die within the week I guess
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ladyluck 31 Jan
Hilarious
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @_b_o_n_e_s_ 1 Feb
this makes me happy
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @_stacktoshi 31 Jan
Garbage in, garbage out, but it's just an arms race. If don't want your art to be consumed by AI, and you're any good, then you're probably going to miss out on lots of real people from consuming your art.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @piecover 31 Jan
AI poisoning tool?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @lunanto 31 Jan
I wonder why anyone would want to learn how to poison
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Krv 31 Jan
People who are used to relying on government enforced monopolies via trademarks, copyrights, patents, and lawsuits feel threatened by tools that make it easy to generate content because their previous methods will not work. Hence, the business in question sees this situation and is attempting to offer a remedy. Whether or not it works, it's a great sell to the desperate and frightened entities.
reply