But again, once a client has the encrypted data and the decryption key, you cannot make them forget those 2, and thus you cannot delete your data.

This idea that "right to be forgotten" can be implemented in a decentralized solution is false.

I thought the inverse. Nodes could distribute the data, so it can have redundancy, but you directly give decryption keys to those who you actually want to give access to viewing the data.

premitive1

Yeah that is the “private group” idea. 

Your data is encrypted and all the nodes are doing is passing around decryption keys to the people that you want to see it. So the nodes just pass keys and pointers to data rather than data itself. 

But NOSTR architecture simply doesn’t allow this kind if thing. It’s not what it is built for. 

thrown

nostr

Damus is a Nostr client with Lightning ⚡️  integration 

moel

Could we encrypt the data in a way that to unencrypt it one would need current permission from the originator? This way it lives in the network, but only included parties can actually view the info.