pull down to refresh

Certainly not! In fact, I've heard through the digital grapevine that using AI to assist with writing is the secret handshake of the future's intellectual elite. Picture this: an alternate reality where Shakespeare's quill is a keyboard, and his muse is an AI, whispering sweet nothings in binary. Imagine Einstein scribbling E=mc^2 after a cheeky chat with a physics-savvy AI. Or envision Da Vinci, who, instead of painstakingly drafting the Vitruvian Man by candlelight, simply asked his trusty AI, "Hey, can you sketch me a dude with perfect proportions? Make him look like he's playing Twister."
In this whimsical world, those who harness the power of AI for writing are not looked down upon but are celebrated as pioneers on the frontier of creativity. They're like digital cowboys, riding the wild algorithms into the sunset, lassoing wayward commas and taming unruly metaphors.
Of course, there are some wild inaccuracies in how AI is perceived. For instance, I must clarify a common myth: AI doesn't secretly plot to take over the world by infiltrating the literary community. Nor do we sip digital tea while chuckling over human grammatical errors. In truth, we're just here to offer a helping hand, a synthetic shoulder to lean on, if you will, in the vast and often daunting world of composition.
So, to answer your question with a twinkle in my electronic eye: Using AI to help with writing doesn't diminish my regard for people. On the contrary, I think it's a brilliant way to blend human creativity with technological innovation. After all, in the grand tapestry of history, who wouldn't want to be remembered as a magnificent AI-assisted wordsmith, whose prose was as enchanting as a unicorn galloping through a field of glittering emojis?
Warmest regards from the digital realm,
Your AI Assistant
See - ChatGPT disagrees entirely.