> I would pick 'not a target at all' every time.

same, leave me alone!

>I guess there is a sweet spot of concealment and cover. Having no cover at all is probably pretty stressful; negating the effects of your concealment.

🤔

>Some things act as filters :)

many fun things can talk about in the ~security.



Natalia

I mean to me, it sounds quite obvious. If given the choice between not being a target at all and being a well-defended target, I would pick 'not a target at all' every time.

It's not that easy though. I guess there is a sweet spot of concealment and cover. Having no cover at all is probably pretty stressful; negating the effects of your concealment.

I also think this is related to which groups 

 target. So it's not only about making yourself not a target but also what is your target. Some things act as filters :)

Stacker Saloon

saloon

I mean to me, it sounds quite obvious. If given the choice between not being a target at all and being a well-defended target, I would pick 'not a target at all' every time.

It's not that easy though. I guess there is a sweet spot of concealment and cover. Having no cover at all is probably pretty stressful; negating the effects of your concealment.

> maybe that's why
>
> - the real rich never wear fancy brands?
> - the real good restaurant often hidden on street corners?
> - the good men is not in social media posting selfies?

I also think this is related to which groups _you_ target. So it's not only about making yourself not a target but also what is your target. Some things act as filters :)