These must be UTXOs where you have control (quorum of private keys)
016.9%
11.4%
2-58.5%
6-1016.9%
11-2015.5%
21-409.9%
41-8011.3%
81-16014.1%
161-3001.4%
301+4.2%
71 votes \ poll ended
pull down to refresh
791 sats \ 0 replies \ @OriginalSize 4 Feb
Let's agree that 81-160 is the view results option.
reply
1100 sats \ 6 replies \ @siggy47 4 Feb
Nice try, fed.
reply
339 sats \ 1 reply \ @joda 4 Feb
Everyone knows the first person to comment this is the REAL fed.
"He who smelt it, is the honeypot calling the kettle black" or something
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 4 Feb
Damn. Foiled again.
reply
177 sats \ 3 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 4 Feb
Damnit I was gonna do this
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @siggy47 4 Feb
You snooze, you lose:)
reply
167 sats \ 1 reply \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 4 Feb
Yea I was driving when the notification for the post came in lol safety first!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 4 Feb
Definitely. It's easy when you're an old guy shut in.
reply
704 sats \ 1 reply \ @RocketNode 4 Feb
How do you count lightning channels or other multisig utxos?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 5 Feb
Depends how many keys you hold. Lighting channel would be ½, a 2of3 multisig where you control 2 keys would be ⅔, etc., etc.
reply
332 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 4 Feb
Don’t remember. Would have to go look at my books to figure it out
reply
81 sats \ 0 replies \ @martinbarilik 4 Feb
Not enough, unfortunatelly.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @kristapsk 5 Feb
I don't know.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Neo 5 Feb
Nice try, IRS!
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @anon 4 Feb
3 Total: 1 single large one that is my real "stack" that was consolidated during low fee environment, life savings UTXO. 2 medium sized ones that are big enough they will not become dust but also aren't so big that if I spend them and "dox" their totals that I would have to worry about people trying to kidnap, blackmail, or extort me if we 10x from here.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @cyberpunk02 4 Feb
too much order, chaos gives privacy
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 5 Feb
privacy versus other risks such as losing access, too many small UTXOs and going to dust or just paying out an uncomfortably high % to fees in the future in a higher fee environment are tradeoffs everyone must make for themselves. I just want more people to thoughtfully weigh their options and make a conscious & active decision.
Personally I place security and the ability to pass BTC to my grandchildren as > any other consideration.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @NotGuiltyThisTime 4 Feb
I'm glad that miles couldn't pass his law about BTC and crypto taxes cause I would think this is milei trying to tax me for my financial freedom
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 4 Feb
As many as possible because I love paying fees, one has to support the miners, after all! /$
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @KLT 4 Feb
OMG we just had a boating accident in Miami!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @stacksatstoday 4 Feb
What's a UTXO? Haha nice try!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @030e0dca83 4 Feb
I'm happy I created a couple large (from my perspective) long before I've studied how UTXOs work
To keep stack large UTXOs I should ignore safety and store some sums on the exchange
reply
678 sats \ 6 replies \ @Eobard 4 Feb
deleted by author
reply
25 sats \ 5 replies \ @Fabs 4 Feb
I'm so sick and tired of this stupid response to anything that even remotely touches the topic of bitcoin-ownership...
reply
31 sats \ 4 replies \ @delta1 4 Feb
imagine how he feels
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Fabs 4 Feb
Not good, maybe it'll help him move to some other line, just like burning your hand on a hot stove helps you to first check the stove before you touch it.
Besides, I'm sure it won't cause him to have sleepless nights.
reply
120 sats \ 2 replies \ @Eobard 5 Feb
deleted by author
reply
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 5 Feb
See? It can be done.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nikotsla 5 Feb
I believe you :)
reply