pull down to refresh
329 sats \ 2 replies \ @xz 9 Feb freebie \ on: Media Bias During El Salvador Election bitcoin
Media bias/media agenda
I don't think there's much difference between the terms.
I do know that, The Guardian is biased and it also has an agenda. You could say that The Guardian is biased towards N. Bukele and a pro-Bitcoin government because it has an agenda and that agenda is to support Washington policy, E.U policy and to an extend to be neutral towards national policy that represent a significant business interest for its sponsors and its stakeholders. When it comes to UK politics, it seems to have clear bias towards creating a division between the two party system and favoring Red Team over Blue. That is the Guardian agenda (as well as content which is uncritical towards any of the other stakeholders that dictate its editorial policy.) I would not even call it corporate media. I'd call it propaganda.
At least the guardian is openly biased. They don’t claim to be objective. BBC on the other hand is owned by the government literally. During the 1930s, BBC censored Churchill
reply
An interesting point.
The Guardian is plainly biased without any illusion that its agenda purports to give a fair or balanced view. As opposed to flatly shilling government propaganda masquerading as the biblical truth. I'm not sure if either should be taken more seriously, they both seem highly questionable sources of information.
reply