pull down to refresh

One could argue that in the historical tradition the 2A cannot by definition apply to assault rifles, but that's probably not the direction SCOTUS is thinking
2A applies to any firearm including assault rifles.
Your reading of history of 2A is wrong.
There is no living constitution.
The direction of scotus is reading and interpreting the constitution instead of making new laws from the bench (Warren court, Roe, Bakke, Sotomayor, etc)
reply