0 sats \ 2 replies \ @025738dda8 16 Feb \ parent \ on: Over 70% of hash power has enabled Full-RBF; Bitcoin Core has not bitcoin
However, CPFP leads to involving other unrelated utxo(s) which can mean an unwanted/unexpected deanonymization. With RBF, you can just use the already exposed change output for paying higher fee.
write
preview
5 sats \ 1 reply \ @kristapsk 16 Feb
Devil is in details, but more or less RBF means similar privacy loss as 1 input, 1 output CPFP. Basically you give more hints to the world in a different ways which output was for recipient and which was change.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @025738dda8 16 Feb
True. It depends on the particular case. That's why I don't say one or the other. Both mechanisms are useful in specific scenarios.
reply