Just wondering... why not?
pull down to refresh
0 new comment
44 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 17 Feb 2024 freebie
You need to be more specific. Long-form content as specified in NIP-23 already supports Markdown. See habla.news. You mean short text notes? NIP-01 explicitly mentions that clients should not parse those as HTML or Markdown:
Why that is I don't know, I can only speculate and I'd rather not.
reply
0 new comment
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @supratic OP 17 Feb 2024
Yes, I mean NIP-1, the most used one! I also assume most of the work is done on the client side and how to render the string contained on it!
I was wondering why NIP-23 yes and not (yet) on NIP-01
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @anon 17 Feb 2024
Twitter doesn't do markdown, why aren't you whining to them?
Allowing markdown excludes text-only clients and forces GUIs on people. Obviously you don't care about that, but a lot of people do. Get over it.
reply
0 new comment
1031 sats \ 0 replies \ @supratic OP 17 Feb 2024
Was just a question, mate. Take it easy. Any particular reason to be anon on this topic?
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @987654321 17 Feb 2024
What's Twitter?
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 17 Feb 2024
I think you replied to the wrong person
reply
0 new comment
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @nout 17 Feb 2024
Some clients like Amethyst supported it initially, but it was frowned upon and it got removed for short notes. Having formatting results in a different type of content being posted and I think I agree it makes sense to only do formatting for long form notes.
reply
0 new comment
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 17 Feb 2024
Yea, this seems like a client thing, not necessarily a protocol thing. Kinda like how on SN, GitHub, etc, it supports markdown, but that doesn't mean you have to use it.
reply
0 new comment
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 17 Feb 2024
Wut? If people use it when they produce content, clients are forced to use it when rendering that content.
reply
0 new comment
10 sats \ 3 replies \ @w3irdrobot 17 Feb 2024
there's not particular reason clients couldn't just support it. even nip1 is just text. afaik the nips don't specify how to treat it. if they do, that seems ridiculous. just parse it as markdown.
reply
0 new comment
1111 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 17 Feb 2024
NIP-01 does though.
reply
0 new comment
519 sats \ 0 replies \ @w3irdrobot 17 Feb 2024
damn. roasted. haha thanks. seems ridiculous that markdown would be called out to not be parsed. perhaps it's an xss attack mitigation
reply
0 new comment
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @supratic OP 17 Feb 2024
deleted by author