If you don't want extreme levels of autonomy and ownership, and don't aspire to be a founder, join a medium sized company. It's the best of both worlds in many ways - equity that's more of a sure thing, not yet extremely bureaucratic, and you can still access the early founders/pioneers.
How do you define medium-sized? Certain company age? Certain employee count? Obviously it's all relative, but I'd be curious to hear your opinion on it.
reply
100 employees or revenue is 100 million
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 20 Feb
I think that's actually a good rule for medium sized. I'm a little biased toward the tiny side of things so I was thinking more so small to medium rather than what is medium on an absolute scale.
reply
I have a friend who works in private equity and he usually targets 100 million for investment then flip in 5 years
reply
Series A or later probably, but it's hard to define exactly what medium means here. Ideally some traction/revenue to stand on. It's less employee count because there are mega-staffed super-early companies these days. Maybe it's a maturity level thing?
I once gave a talk at Cal along these lines. Back then I said it meant "profitable or nearly so" but times have changed some.
reply