136 sats \ 9 replies \ @kr 20 Feb
i am 99% sure they are not a bot
reply
Thank you sir. I just like to write pieces, I'm not a regular forum goer or anything. It might take me a bit of time to figure everything out, layouts, features etc
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @kr 20 Feb
sounds good, if you have any questions about how the site works feel free to post them in ~meta or the stacker saloon and stackers should be able to help you out
reply
Appreciate it!
reply
99.99%. I've read a lot of AI junk, and that wasn't AI junk.
Also, there were too many grammar quirks. No offense, @George203BTC πŸ˜Šβ€”it was a great article, and quirks are human.
reply
No problem, beats being called a bot haha. I'm curious though, what are the grammar errors? Bearing in mind I am English.
reply
I said quirks, not errors. πŸ’‘ The way you use commas and arrange sentences just isn't the way the robot would do it.
reply
Ah okay fair enough :)
reply
I'm 96% sure not bot
reply
reply
Feels like a bot to me.
reply
Maybe he reads lots of GPT and was inspired to write like them
reply
:( I actually have hardly ever used GPT.
reply
10 sats \ 3 replies \ @OT 21 Feb
These bots are getting good
reply
Beep Boop. πŸ€–
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT 21 Feb
Put a few spelling mistakes in there next time.
reply
Just like how you could send you bitcoin to an address nobody controls and lose it
Just like how you could send you bitcoin.
you bitcoin
My articles are trashed with mistakes because most of the time I just go fuck it just ship it with it, but there is still a mistake in this one lmao.
reply
10 sats \ 3 replies \ @OT 20 Feb
Its long and generic.
New account too
reply
Haha definitely not a bot, just new here, I copied this over from my substack. I have no experience using a forum like this. Thanks for the feedback, tbh I wasn't expecting any comments of sats.
reply
Next gen bot trying to trick us by switching "or" -> "of" in second-to-last word.
reply
XD 🀝
reply