I like the idea of a bounty for a best answer. It seems like there would need to be an amount of time in the beginning where the answers are compiled, then a second phase where voting occurs. Rather than the OP choosing the winner, the vote could determine the correct answer. You should probably be prevented from voting if you are one of the participants, and the post should show up as a 'new post' upon the beginning of each phase. Each of these two phases would need a time-limit or answer limit and/or vote limit associated with them. These request/bounties will likely get lots of traffic because people will continue to come back to check on it. It would also require notifications to participants so they know where and when to come back after each of the phases are elapsed.
Unfortunately, voting opens up the possibility to be sybil attacked (make 1000 accounts and vote for your own). To keep it simple, the decision should stay with the OP. Maybe implement a way to punish obvious malfeasance.
reply
User must put some money at stake, if don't choose an answer lose the money. But what if all answers suck?.
Too many vulnerabilities.
reply