131 sats \ 3 replies \ @TonyGiorgio 22 Feb
This type of solution is almost as old as Bitcoin. In the end, anything that requires on chain human readable identities is not going to work. It's unattainable and absolutely should not have the word scalable in the name.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinosphere 22 Feb
deleted by author
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ca98am79 OP 22 Feb
We spent a year making absolutely sure it is scalable so I would be very interested to know why you think it isn't. Did you see that the on chain spaces are limited to 3600 per year and subspaces can be scaled off chain to billions
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ca98am79 OP 22 Feb
deleted by author
reply
47 sats \ 0 replies \ @go 22 Feb
huh@meh
reply
232 sats \ 0 replies \ @koqoo 22 Feb
this is a big step forward!
#kudos to the team
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @hasherstacker 22 Feb
Fascinating.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @joda 22 Feb
I'd be worried about the b0b@ and 1inda@ scams
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TNStacker 22 Feb
deleted by author
reply