89 sats \ 1 reply \ @MattInTech 26 Feb
Looks like a cool concept, but nothing beats seedsigner for bitcoin-only hw wallets imho. Still, good to have alternatives, might turn out useful for someone.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @GregAsks 27 Feb
Agree, Seedsigner the best 💪
reply
56 sats \ 6 replies \ @JuanMiguel 26 Feb
Powered by Shopify, lol. NGMI
reply
30 sats \ 5 replies \ @Kaffi 26 Feb
can you expand on that? is it custodial in some way or you just don't like the company?
reply
20 sats \ 4 replies \ @TheBTCManual 26 Feb
Lol coz anything closed source is bad apparently
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @JuanMiguel 26 Feb
Big-tech. Closed-source. Privacy-invasive.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Kaffi 26 Feb
yeah I don't know if that alone is enough. sure its less trusted than an open-source wallet but thats usually not the wallet you keep your life savings. I still believe having 2-3 harware wallets with different tiers of security makes sense.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @JuanMiguel 26 Feb
Explain your argument to why you need a hardware wallet, or even multiple of them.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Kaffi 27 Feb
like why you need one at all? so you don't get your life savings stolen by either a custodian or just someone accessing your trust wallet. Airgapping from the internet is huge also.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @hasherstacker 26 Feb
Looks like we have another option. Good one.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @joda 26 Feb
Sounds cool! I don't see the hassle of having a powered hardware signer when you are always using it in tandem with a powered device, but cool concept. Would like to see a comparison to tapsigner.
reply