Here's this presentation presented by Maxim:
reply
From page 8
• Discussions, proposals, Q&A: https://github.com/orgs/LNP-BP/discussions • Standards: https://github.com/LNP-BP/LNPBPs • RGB working group: https://github.com/RGB-WG • Lightning working group: https://github.com/LNP-WG • Decentralized storage & messaging group: https://github.com/Storm-WG
If you wish to clone all the repos in a github account just use the following bash script
#!/bin/bash if [ -z "$1" ]; then echo "waiting for the following arguments: repo " exit 1 else name=$1 fi cntx="users" #echo $name #echo $cntx username="USERNAME" access_token="TOKEN" list=$( curl -s -u "$username":"$access_token" "https://api.github.com/$cntx/$name/repos?page=1&per_page=100" | grep -e 'clone_url*' | cut -d \" -f 4 ) readarray -t list_arr <<< "$list" for (( i=0 ; i<${#list_arr[@]} ; i++ )) ; do git clone ${list_arr[$i]} done
Create a git access token
Than edit the fields USERNAME and TOKEN on the script and run it.
reply
Did I really just see a "Buy RGB token" slide in that PDF?
reply
If you look closely at the token you'll see it's a joke :)
reply
They should've really compressed the PDF... 🙊
reply
тут можно картинку выложить.... а вдруг вирус?
reply
Nooooooo whyyyyyyyy
reply
It's sort of a next layer, in a same way LN or Liquid is a next layer.
reply
Yeah, and the lightning network already has Taro which is terrible. What I'm really groaning about is the shitcoins. "If You Aren't Trying to be Money, Why Do You Need a Coin?" #44100
reply
Is there any actual code done on Taro? I thought that was just proposals.
I hear you on the shitcoins part of this - also not happy about this - or rather I can see pros and cons and I don't know which of those wins over the other...
reply
its just verifiable air miles for a digital age. not money but system of utility codebase where rules can be set based on central issuer but still adhering to Bitcoin protocol. what s wrong about it?
should these miles be in sats outside of the issuers control? why would I want that? I want you connected in the ecosystem. why not experiment what it all provides
reply
You don't buy air miles, you buy plane tickets and you're given air miles and spend them on a service.
Should a rewards points (or in store credit) system be in sats? At the very least there should be some sort of mechanism so that the issuer can not monetize their rewards points lmao like getting in trouble for failing to provide the good or service those rewards points were promised to do and restricting in store credit from being bought and sold on the public market perhaps by backing the points with money like sats.
reply
of course not - but thats the point. you are given these miles to apemd on luggage capacity enhancement or other perks AT the issuer's ecosystem
the benefit is digital verifiability and transparency + convertability. reputation points dont have to be backed by money - why would I as an issuer want that? they serve
reply
Because if you don't, your establishment is going to have a tarnished reputation as being part of "the crypto scam" because of all the bad actors using hype to dump on the market to enrich themselves. So by backing it by money, you ensure its only usefulness is still that it is used at your and no one else establishment in order to get repeat customers, but at the same time do a little bit to salvage the reputation hit of association.
reply
Because you cant stop people from doing stuff.
reply
That doesn't explain why those people are doing the stuff though lmao.
But you know what we can do? Try our best to seperate ourselves from it and call out the people who use it to create scams especially ones which allow the creator special permissions like arbitrary token creation or claim decentralization but then have sole software change controls, premines etc etc etc.
Its just, its going to be harder to relieve ourselves of the association because it'll be built on Bitcoin, people will now associate and accuse Bitcoin of scamming (because people are pretty surface level and perception is reality)
reply