Yes. Maybe not all cancers, all the time, but yes, for sure.
You MUST read Dr. Thomas Seyfried, or listen to some interviews with him. His alternate theory of cancer (that it's a metabolic disease, not a genetic disease) has been around since the 1930's, initially promoted by Dr Warburg, who got a Nobel Prize for it.
There's a huge cancer industry that doesn't want to lose the giant pipeline of money being funneled to it. Having said that, I believe there are some big-name clinics that are currently experimenting with novel (metabolic) therapies for cancer.
It disgusts me when I see all those pink ribbon benefits for breast cancer research. The breast cancer industry in particular is complicit in lies, misleading women on what causes breast cancer, scaring them into unnecessary, expensive, invasive tests and treatments. It's just a massive scam. Not that breast cancer doesn't exist, but there's so much scamming around it, that I despise the whole industry.
Also here's a few drug names that I've been jotting down, in case someone I know ever gets cancer - apparently they can sometimes be very effective, are super cheap, and will probably get no research funded because they upset the narrative. I know nothing else about these but that I've read some articles about them being un-explored cures.
Fenbendazole Inositol Hexaphosphate Ivermectin
Talking about the big pipeline, it's a reality. People take it as a conspiracy theory but most people don't understand the size of the pipeline is as big as the GDP of many countries.
Yes, I can see 'how those pink ribbons' hold for political aspirations and women who are kind by virtue fall a prey to them. Pink ribbons are causing emotional traps.
reply