About instagibb’s comment is not like himself has recognized the value of my technical observations w.r.t soundness of its own pet project in a different context, ephemeral anchor (cf. https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/ephemeral-anchors-and-mevil/383).

So I’ll let Greg Sanders explain himself here on the present case. Apart of the present divergence, he’s someone I respect professionally in Bitcoin.

On the call to take a sabbatical, look what I said in my sabbatical announcement post.

"The open feud with some people at Spiral and Chaincode, whatever significant are their contributions to bitcoin. Those people had my trust and confidence, they broke them and I’m not Mother Teresa. This has been ongoing since almost 2 years now, I guess this will take as long or even more to solve and I prefer to allocate the best of my time and energy to arrange a resolution satisfying everyone. Long-term principles at stake concern every other open-source dev.”

I’ll let you observe by yourself to what organizations belongs the people I’m pointing out the standards of behaviors in my post.

Apart of them, my talents stay widely appreciated among the remaining on the Bitcoin space. At least easy to say more than yours anon ?