Why don't we stop creating companies to start building ecash federations?
184 sats \ 2 comments \ @satoshiplanet 7 Mar ecash
You know, sat... launch a company is to bend to all kinds of state impositions, so using bitcoin is always the best idea, not only from a philosophical, economic or technological view, since barriers to start using Bitcoin are broken, even nocoiners understand that fiat goes to zero while bitcoin towards infinity. Keeping in mind all the advances within the bitcoin ecosystem with multiple bitcoin projects and explosion of L2s, today we have in our hands awesome vehicles like federated ecash, so why don't start building tools under fedimint to create federations around the world instead of old structures which dismantle us as they fall taking their last breaths? Despite being centralized entities I consider that they will always be more efficient, especially from an organizational view in a cooperative work environment.
Thanks for reading, be humble, or not, but please stack sats and let us know your opinion.
write
preview
related posts
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 8 Mar
Companies want to build something users want, not deal with how they get paid. I believe that's also why SaaS has become so prevalent: outsource everything so you can focus on your product-market fit. I honestly don't understand the question, I think. Don't you need companies that use ecash federations?
Or are you talking about a more dramatic shift in which this idea of founding a company no longer exists?
even nocoiners understand that fiat goes to zero while bitcoin towards infinity.
Do they? If so, why are they nocoiners?
so why don't start building tools under fedimint to create federations
I think this is exactly what is happening right now as we speak, it's just more like watching grass grow and we only notice moments like when ~fedimint was founded on SN that something is happening.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 7 Mar
I'm wondering if there is any update on the ability to verify issued tokens.
reply