"Compliance" can mean different things. Presently, we associate that with adhering to rules as imposed by the state. Freedom-seeking people generally consider this compliance to be "bad" because it's imposed via threat of violence and it's hard or impossible to opt out.

But imagine a post-state AnCap world with Bitcoin as money. You probably live in a town or city, that is, in some incorporated community, and by continuing to live there, you agree to the rules as set by that community (which could range from "no littering" and "no wi-fi signals stronger than X dB" to "food sold here must adhere to these standards, be labeled such and such, oh and no meat allowed").

That's still "compliance" but you presumably opted in when you moved in. Does it make it "good"? Or just "neutral"?