You should know though, by reasoning and/or looking at history.

Their is no such a thing that can be solved better by a forced monopolistic entity than by a free market. Their is no good reason to prevent competition in any field unless you fear not offering a good enough product/service.
Or it's a personal/subjective issue that you want to solve by violence, but it's obviously immoral.

Again in a free world, nothing would stop you and your fellow socialists to gather and associate in order to create your own mini state. The only question is: why on earth would you want to force people into your association ? In other words to go one step further in the story, why communists always end building walls to prevent people from leaving their nightmare of a society ?

Cant' you agree to disagree, do your things, and let people chose what they want ?

Louferlou

libertarian

My questions for libertarians

Voldemort

I don't know if a monopolistic entity can. I think for most things it can't. However, even with very small probability that the market cannot adequately solve the most pressing issues, my expected value is better with a minimal government. 

