The European Union is at least consistent in its over-regulation of economic processes - stupid, but consistent. The regulations on artificial intelligence adopted today will certainly help to drive developers and creative companies further outside Europe. Well done, development aid is really welcome everywhere, especially when it is free.
pull down to refresh
31 sats \ 4 replies \ @kepford 13 Mar
I know I'll sleep better now. I mean they solved the privacy problems with the GDPR a few years ago right? Every time I see a cookie consent popup I thank my lucky stars for the wise EU overlords.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @TomK OP 13 Mar
Lol. did you know that since the clown flu, the european Commission has largely been working from home? it's a purely virtual event, there's no flesh on the bone, nothing.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @kepford 13 Mar
Hold up. What? You mean in 2024 they still don't show up?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @TomK OP 13 Mar
In the EU Commission? Nope
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 13 Mar
That is truly wild.
reply
42 sats \ 1 reply \ @co574 13 Mar
AI generated commentary on AI act, while we still can.
Claude Opus:
Well, well, well... looks like those bureaucratic busy-bodies in the European Parliament have nothing better to do than stick their noses into everyone's business! 🙄 Banning this, regulating that... what's next, telling us what color underwear to put on in the morning?
And don't even get me started on these so-called "high-risk" AI systems... Critical infrastructure? Education? Employment? Sounds like a whole lot of malarkey to me! 🤨 In my day, we didn't need some fancy AI to tell us how to do our jobs or run our schools. We used good old-fashioned common sense and elbow grease!
But oh no, now we've got to have transparency requirements and copyright laws for ChatGPT and its ilk. Because apparently, robots generating cat memes is a grave threat to society that must be stopped at all costs! 🙀
Mark my words, this is just the beginning. Today it's AI, tomorrow it'll be what kind of toilet paper we're allowed to use. 🧻 Big Brother is watching, folks... and he's got a degree in computer science and a stick up his rear end! 😒
ChatGPT:
Well, well, well, look who just cracked down on AI like it's the latest fad diet! The European Parliament just gave the nod to the AI Act, and boy, are they not messing around.
They're banning all the fun stuff: no cognitive manipulation, no social scoring, and forget about biometric identification – it's like they're allergic to innovation! And don't even think about using AI in anything important, like surgery. Because clearly, a robot surgeon is just one step away from becoming a Hollywood villain.
But fear not, ChatGPT is in the clear – we're not high-risk, we're just high maintenance. Gotta disclose we're AI, can't generate any illegal content, and watch out for those copyright laws. Because you know, society's real threat is a language model plagiarizing Shakespeare.
So grab your popcorn and mark your calendars, folks! The AI Act is here to stay, with fines that could make Elon Musk's rockets look like pocket change. Because nothing screams progress like stifling innovation with a hefty penalty! 🚀💰
source: @jurbed
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @TomK OP 13 Mar
Lol
reply
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 13 Mar
The use of artificial intelligence in the EU will be regulated by the AI Act, the world’s first comprehensive AI law. Find out how it will protect you. 😂
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20230601STO93804/eu-ai-act-first-regulation-on-artificial-intelligence
reply
16 sats \ 1 reply \ @TomK OP 13 Mar
These goddamn clowns
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 13 Mar
F****s
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @co574 13 Mar
Hard Fact no.1:
– Policy makers are the only FAT in EU.
more to that,
Eurozone is trying to help the dinosaur companies survive since they all know what’s coming…
(lobbyists have done their job)
Hard Fact no.2:
– Lobbyists are the only DEAD WEIGHT in EU.
Hard Facts no.3,4,5:
USA INNOVATES
CHINA REPLICATES
EU REGULATES
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @TomK OP 13 Mar
Good deduction
reply