I was looking for something in bitcointalk archives and I came across this 2011 thread where people first start to wonder if Satoshi is gone. It's amazing to read how people were thinking about Satoshi's role at the time. Also, it contains the very first Satoshi impersonator.
Satoshi posts for the last time on bitcointalk on 13 December 2010.
On 12 January, kiba starts a thread with this:
Guys, I think Satoshi left us. Last active: December 13.
The first responses are mostly jokes (He's Amish, no internet, planning world domination, works for the CIA, a p2p virtual entity) but then the next day jgarzik posts
It has now been exactly one month since satoshi was "last active" on these forums.
He hasn't shown any life sign since december 15th. We have good reasons to worry. Has anyone heard from him recently ? PS. I also have to point out that his disappearance occured only a few days after the wikileaks article mentionning bitcoin ...
But most people seem to think it's nothing too different. MoonShadow posts:
Winter break, perhaps? Working on his thesis? Or simply watching from another identity? Or too busy coding to bother with the debate. Perhaps he just decided to sell some of his bitcoin now that each is worth so much more than when he started, and felt he deserved a holiday to someplace warm. You people worry too much.
This is one of the stupidest thread of the century.
In true bitcoiner fashion, bittersweet posts
Fortunately Bitcoin works just fine without Satoshi.
And then in response to an argument about whether Satoshi is male or female
Yeah, I prefer to imagine Satoshi is a hot girl
On 14 January, brocktice posts
And now Gavin has it in github anyway. Whoever Satoshi is, (s)he published the paper and the code, and we can take it from here without any further interaction.
2011.01.13 <gavinandresen> I got email from Satoshi about a tricky bug today. He's just busy.
Quite a few people express relief, and the thread quickly descends into a ridiculous discussion of anagrams for Satoshi Nakamoto. There is one particularly good story by ShadowOfHarbinger explaining how Satoshi is actually the Terminator.
By 28 February, after Satoshi still hasn't returned to bitcointalk, people start getting worried again:
Maybe we should come to serious talking again. I mean, has anyone seen any life sign of satoshi ? Accidents happen all the time ...
To which ribuck responds with a surprisingly prescient answer:
It's fairly clear that Satoshi planned this absence. Before he became inactive, he asked Gavin to take over the build process. He also removed the part of the code that allowed him to send a PGP-signed message that would put Bitcoin clients into safe mode. So I don't think Satoshi's absence is due to having met with an accident. It would be quite OK if Satoshi has chosen to melt away into the background, and if his identity is never discovered. The idea of an invention as great as Bitcoin having been unleashed by an anonymous benefactor is quite cool. It will lead to some great speculation in the future though. Is Satoshi Hal Finney? Is Satoshi Peter Gutmann? Is Satoshi Bruce Schneier? Is Satoshi Gavin Andreessen?
ShadowOfHarbinger responds:
I mean what creator would resign completely from watching his creation grow ? After some time passes, he surely will show up and start developing Bitcoin himself again under different credentials. The point is, the guy just wants some privacy. And this is good, because that shows clearly that it's not the fame he is after, but ideals. IMHO we should respect that and leave his identity alone.
Which leads to more (mostly ridiculous) guesses about who Satoshi is: Bill Gates?, Ben Bernake?, Julian Assange?, Neal Stephenson.
And we get the first Satoshi impersonator on 10 March. The impersonator quickly gives everyone instructions:
Why don't you guys believe I am Satoshi? I am here to give direction to the client and the bitcoin network. First, we must use 1024-bit encryption to secure the network from Russian hackers. Next, we must contact Barack Obama to replace the American dollar with Bitcoin. Finally, I want you to stand up right now and yell, "Bitcoin!!!" at the top of your lungs. This works best in a cubicle work environment. Once we accomplish these little things I will give further direction. Satoshi out! P.S. I am Japanese.
I wonder if Craig Wright has a future in claiming to be this first impersonator of Satoshi (although, the impersonator clearly had a great sense of humor, so it may be equally difficult to prove...). Also, I wonder if Frankie MacDonald was inspired by this post...
The thread mostly peters out after this, although the 2011 Tohoku tsunami that hits Japan generates a few somewhat illogical concerns about Satoshi.
What struck me most about this thread is the way that even in 2011, when I'm sure Bitcoin must have felt much more ephemeral, most bitcoiners were firm on the idea that it did not matter if Satoshi disappeared, and even that it was a good thing.
It's weird to consider what a nothing bitcoin was then, and how it must have felt, a handful of weirdos doing this thing that you could imagine, in a science fiction way, turning into something someday. But just how insular it must have been. Imagine literally nobody that you knew, other than the contents of this forum, having any idea wtf you were talking about.
And now it's what it is: ETFs, Presidential candidates talking about it, on the mainstream news every day. Must be so surreal to some of those early participants.
reply
I was reading some posts where people were dickering over how much they would pay each other for little things like writing an article or making a picture...they turned out to be very good wages!
reply
That's pretty much how most open source development is.
The only difference is that Bitcoin is actually money.
Most of the Internet services and devices we all use today were created thanks to a handful of really smart and dedicated people that use their spare time to tinker with an open source project.
“Open-source software is the foundation of 99% of the world’s software,” said Martin Woodward, VP of developer relations at GitHub
reply
Great find! I was also digging through the early days of bitcointalk a few weeks ago and found it fascinating to read what people were saying a decade ago.
reply
Same will happen with SN :)
reply
hello future stacker.news peoples!
reply
👀 We need a fail-safe auto-delete script
reply
I've never done that on SN, but it sounds interesting. I'll do it when I have more time. Thanks for the tip.
reply
The zap amounts will be especially fun to look at in the future
reply
It will be interesting for sure, but I think it will only be noticeable if Bitcoin multiplies significantly (3x or more). Since Lightning zaps are currently relatively low in value (US, EU), I don't think it will make much of a difference. For example, a 100 sat (7 cent) zap now and 100 when multiplied by 3 (21 cents) is still a low value.
reply
You think the initials are a coincidence?
reply
Yeah, but an awesome one at that
reply
I never really thought about it much, but obviously there had to be that moment. What's amazing is that people are mostly nonchalant about. Gotta love bitcoiners.
reply
45 sats \ 1 reply \ @freetx 13 Mar
From memory this more or less coincided with Gavin speaking to CIA tech session.
I have to feel those are connected events...perhaps he felt "now with CIA involved" its time to disappear.
reply
reply
He also removed the part of the code that allowed him to send a PGP-signed message that would put Bitcoin clients into safe mode.
Goodness gracious I'm glad we don't have that anymore lmao
reply
Training wheels gotta come off.
reply
This is awesome. Thanks for going through these and giving us the highlights.
reply
Thanks for taking the time to write this up. This is great!
reply
wow thank you for this post, very interesting
reply
"Yeah, I prefer to imagine Satoshi is a hot girl"
Made me LOL
reply
I, too, prefer to imagine satoshi that way.
reply
I find it amazing that Satoshi's disappearance has become more than just a historical chapter. It genuinely indicated the start of a new era in which collective creativity and accountability took front stage.... Satoshi's absence allowed Bitcoin to expand beyond the shadow of its founder, promising that no single person could exert undue power over the network. It became a canvas for collective imagination, a project owned by everyone and no one at the same time.
reply
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @jgbtc 14 Mar
I love that he just quietly walked away. No grand exit with a lot of drama. It's the ultimate power move. He had zero doubt about the future success of bitcoin.
reply
This is by design I think. I don't think he was planning to manage all of it 10 years from the starting point. Deliver MVP (min value product) and let other smart people run with it, Keep it on rails so to speak, and then let it grow. I think it worked out pretty well though. Personally I would do the same thing. Plus there is personal security factor of pissing off all the banks and money printing governments in the world...lol
reply
Pretty wild foresight.
reply
Great summary.
reply
Wow, this is a really great piece of history! We all know that Hal passed away, what about the other guys like Peter Gutmann, Bruce Schneier, Gavin Andreessen? New names to me. Did they work on Bitcoin? Maybe still active? Does anyone know?
reply
The 2011 Bitcointalk thread discussed Satoshi Nakamoto's disappearance from the Bitcoin community. Satoshi's last post on the forum was on December 13, 2010, which led to speculation about their whereabouts[1]. Initial reactions ranged from jokes to genuine concern, with some users suggesting Satoshi might be on a break or working under a different identity[1].
As time passed without Satoshi's return, community members began to worry more seriously. However, Gavin Andresen reported receiving an email from Satoshi about a bug on January 13, 2011, temporarily alleviating concerns[1].
The thread revealed that Satoshi had planned their absence, having asked Gavin to take over the build process and removing their ability to send emergency messages to Bitcoin clients[1]. This led to speculation about Satoshi's true identity, with various theories proposed[1].
The discussion also featured the first Satoshi impersonator, who humorously gave absurd instructions to the community[1]. Despite initial concerns, many Bitcoin supporters emphasized that the cryptocurrency could function without Satoshi's involvement, demonstrating early confidence in the decentralized nature of the project[1].
Sources [1] "Guys, I think Satoshi left us" > 2011 Bitcointalk thread \ stacker news ~bitcoin #463065
reply
Based on the search results, there are a few reasons why some people may have speculated about a potential connection between Satoshi Nakamoto and WikiLeaks:
  1. Timing of Satoshi's disappearance: Satoshi's last public post on the Bitcoin forum was on December 13, 2010, which was shortly after WikiLeaks began receiving attention for potentially using Bitcoin. This timing led to speculation about a possible connection[1].
  2. Satoshi's concern about WikiLeaks: In one of his last messages, Satoshi directly addressed the WikiLeaks situation, expressing worry about the organization using Bitcoin. He feared that the attention from WikiLeaks could "destroy" the Bitcoin community in its early stages[2][4].
  3. Shared cypherpunk origins: Both Bitcoin and WikiLeaks had roots in the cypherpunk community, which could suggest a potential connection between their creators[4].
  4. Fear of government intervention: Satoshi seemed particularly concerned about drawing too much attention from governments, especially the US government. This aligns with WikiLeaks' adversarial relationship with authorities[2][3].
  5. Privacy concerns: Satoshi's desire for anonymity and sudden disappearance could be seen as similar to the privacy-focused ethos of WikiLeaks[1][3].
However, it's important to note that there is no concrete evidence linking Satoshi to WikiLeaks, and these connections remain speculative. Satoshi's concerns about WikiLeaks using Bitcoin were more likely related to protecting the nascent cryptocurrency from potential government backlash during its vulnerable early stages[2][4].
Sources [1] "Guys, I think Satoshi left us" > 2011 Bitcointalk thread \ stacker news ~bitcoin #463065 [2] Why was Satoshi worried when Wikileaks brought attention to bitcoin? https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/p4hi3s/why_was_satoshi_worried_when_wikileaks_brought/ [3] The Satoshi Paradox | Reuters https://www.reuters.com/article/world/the-satoshi-paradox-idUS998579585/ [4] How Bitcoin And WikiLeaks Saved Each Other - Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerhuang/2019/04/26/how-bitcoin-and-wikileaks-saved-each-other/ [5] How Bitcoin Rescued WikiLeaks from Financial Collapse https://www.helloarc.ai/blog/how-bitcoin-rescued-wikileaks-from-financial-collapse
reply
Wonderful piece of archaeology. Thank you.
reply
I wonder he returns some day and lead us to his vision faster. I can just say, thank you Satoshi for opening up the doors for financial freedom.
reply