About halfway through the month and we’ve hit 4m sats, racking up over a million sats!
What will the rewards be end of month?
I’m going with 6m-9m.
Less than 5m30.0%
5-6m45.0%
6m-9m20.0%
10m+ 5.0%
20 votes \ poll ended
pull down to refresh
91 sats \ 9 replies \ @grayruby 14 Mar
I think we might see a bit of a drop off in the second half of the month as people's stacks might start dwindling without getting the benefit of daily reward top ups.
reply
71 sats \ 7 replies \ @Undisciplined 14 Mar
I think that's right, except that we might see a sprint to the finish in the last couple of days. There are big stakes for the top few ranks, so it would be odd if we didn't see big zapping sprees as we jockey for position.
reply
159 sats \ 6 replies \ @grayruby 14 Mar
I am planning my last 3 days of posts. Subjects as follows:
- cowboy hats
- why SN is awesome
- how I orange pilled my mailman
- the USD is going to hyperinflate next month
- what a blackrock bitcoin fork will look like
- lightning has failed
Boom first place here I come.
reply
50 sats \ 4 replies \ @Undisciplined 14 Mar
Nice! I'm going to zap the bajeezus out of those as soon as they go up.
First place here I come.
reply
24 sats \ 3 replies \ @grayruby 14 Mar
I do think the madness is a cool idea and fun but it does create some perverse incentives and I think because it only pays the top 64 stackers that it is great for current stacker engagement but not so great at enticing new users.
reply
82 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 14 Mar
I agree. I've proposed layering different rewards timeframes: i.e. split the rewards pool between daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly rewards.
kr indicated there was some interest in trying something like that.
reply
84 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 14 Mar
I think it's a good idea. A one-week minimum period seems balanced to me. The method you proposed is fair and rewards all stackers in a balanced way, whether they spend more or less time. Overall, the rewards are proportional to the time that stackers spend on Stacker News.
reply
117 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 14 Mar
I like doing this every March as March madness but maybe only half the rewards should be accumulated and the rest go out daily.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 14 Mar
Thank goodness someone else caught that. I was starting to think I was the only one.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 14 Mar
You're right, there's a good chance that's happening. I think it's already started. I could be wrong, because I don't have the data, but it seems to me like there are already a lot of posts on the home hot page with relatively few sats. But that could be because of stackers confidence coefficient.
reply
129 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 14 Mar
If you look at month averages it's usually 4-5m.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @grayruby 14 Mar
But it's madness. Surely in madness we can achieve new heights. I just think the pace might slow down a bit as stacker's stacks dwindle without daily rewards. It's a mental thing. Even though you know you are getting rewards at end of the month and you can see your estimated rewards you still think twice about your zapping when you see your balance declining.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 14 Mar
short answer
14 d ---- 1M
31 d ---- x
x = 2.2M
3M + 2.2M = 5.2M
reply