pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 11 replies \ @Bell_curve 22 Mar \ parent \ on: EU agrees to expropriate profits from Russian assets to capitalize war bonds econ
1905 revolution was trivial
Romanov dynasty was still in place
It wasn't actually so simple, it was different in different parts of Russian empire. In Latvia it wa also revolution against German speaking local nobility, at some point revolutionaries fully controlled several towns and railway lines. And it had lasting effect, which impacted events of 1917 - Constitution was enacted and parliament was established. Vladimir Lenin later stated that 1905 revolution was the great rehearsal and without it "revolution" of 1917 would have been impossible (bolshevik uprising was actually just coup d'etat, it being mass revolution is Soviet propaganda).
reply
Revolution and coup d’etat are synonymous.
We can quibble about semantics but the effect is the same: change in leadership.
Glorious Revolution was also a coup
Coup can have popular support or not.
After October Revolution there was a 5 year civil war between reds and whites. Karensky made a mistake by being neutral
reply
There was a lot of mistakes by various parties back then, bolsheviks used that and seized power. They were small fraction actually at the beginning of 1917.
reply
Very small. And Lenin was stuck in Germany in 1917, almost didn’t make it to Russia.
By 1922 they consolidated power.
More proof a small dangerous minority can gain influence and power
reply
More proof a small dangerous minority can gain influence and power
Exactly, that's what neo-marxists are trying to do in the West for decades.
reply
When you were born who was Russian leader? Brezhnev?
reply
Yuri Andropov. But my memories starts with Gorbachev.
reply
1985