40k sat reward for me. Not bad, especially when I've not been very active this month. Less dopamine for "tipping top content early" which is usually what I get more rewards for previously. Divided out by 30 days, it's about what I would make on a normal good day with rewards alone, but I definitely didn't get that much every day so net positive for sure.
One stat that would be interesting, even if you had less signups, did you have more new user retention for the month? I would suspect that was down too, given there was less daily rewards.
65 sats \ 2 replies \ @kr 1 Apr
good feedback, and glad you’re earning more sats. this should be the outcome for everyone on the leaderboard (as compared to daily rewards).
signups were labeled “bad” because they were not up, but they weren’t down either. they have been stuck at roughly 800 stackers/month for a long time, will be focusing on this number specifically with other experiments.
the percentage of new stackers earning sats in their first week was up slightly in March, but there is a lot of variability and it’s in line with our long-term average.
reply
Are 1M sats per month the normal reward pool?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @kr 2 Apr
SN funds 3M sats into the rewards pool each month, the remainder is from zap, post, job fees (the total rewards pool was ~4.5M in March)
reply