Ossification is a dead end and would just kill Bitcoin.
Is this statement an obvious fact?
In nature, there are many examples where little to no change occurred in hundreds of millions of years: Sharks, horse-shoe crabs, cockroaches, etc. They reached "evolution perfection" or to put in a less flattering perspective: They have reached genetic Ossification. That is, they found a place where change is simply not required because it just works. I recognize that these species named have an inherent selection bias because they are the ones that survived. Countless other creatures that could not adapt perished.
I know the idea of ossification in software development is considered a dead end. And for apps, this is largely true. However, when we talk of Internet protocols that are crucial for its survival: DNS, SMTP, BGP and others, serious care should be considered before any change is implemented.
Few people are saying, "let's tinker with DNS to improve it", and there are fewer cases where such changes get implemented. But they do happen after very careful and considered review. And they happen very quickly when survival is at stake (major security breaches e.g.). DNS works so well that we seldom think about it. Bitcoin is not an app. We should study and follow the trajectory of change management that other crucial Internet protocols have undergone. If a change were made to DNS with unforeseen catastrophic consequences, the Internet could shut down. If a change were made to Bitcoin with unforeseen catastrophic consequences, the Internet of Money™ would shut down. Perhaps that is the very reason why we don't "tinker and make changes" to crucial Internet protocols.
31 sats \ 3 replies \ @om 4 Apr
Few people are saying, "let's tinker with DNS to improve it",
Proposed DNS killers started with Namecoin that dates back to the times of Satoshi and continue to this day.
and there are fewer cases where such changes get implemented.
ENS, Unstoppable Domains and DIDs got some traction. There is still an ongoing debate whether DNS over HTTPS is worth turning on, the question being whether you want to give your data to your local provider or to some global spy company like Cloudflare.
DNS works so well that we seldom think about it.
DNS is a privacy nightmare and and an attack vector for deplatforming (see attempts to deny Gab a domain name by GoDaddy). The whole public key infrastructure is a dystopian hell, see Belarus and Kazakhstan mandating installation of government-issued certificates and EU's attempt to legislate the same.
reply
Proposed DNS killers started with Namecoin that dates back to the times of Satoshi and continue to this day.
For a protocol that governs just about every routable packet on the Internet and has remained stable and functional for decades it's remarkable how few core changes there have been. Compatibility with IPv6 was a notable one.
DNS is a privacy nightmare
So is Bitcoin. Just ask Chainalysis.
Does that mean we fork DNS to be better at privacy? Does that mean we fork Bitcoin to behave like Monero? No. That is what layer 2s are for: use Tor to keep Cloudflare on their toes, and there are some zero knowledge methods out there keeping Chainalysis in R&D mode.
reply
45 sats \ 1 reply \ @om 4 Apr
it's remarkable how few core changes there have been
Because it's heavily regulated, not because it's perfect.
Does that mean we fork Bitcoin to behave like Monero?
Well, such a thing exists, it's Monero (not strictly a fork, whatever). It lost to Bitcoin due to many factors, most importantly inherently horrible SPV wallets, no scalability solution, and no covenants at all (which delayed atomic swaps 10 years or so). But it wasn't obvious from the start that this was a bad idea, and some Moneroids appear here for whom it's still not obvious.
use Tor to keep Cloudflare on their toes
I am in fact doing just that right now. However, many sites, especially Cloudflare ones, don't work under Tor. It's an ongoing war.
reply
However, many sites, especially Cloudflare ones, don't work under Tor. It's an ongoing war.
I hear you. It's like the Great Firewall of China run by a corporation. I think Cloudflare routes 30+ % of the Internet now? Yet another deeply concerning centralization of power.
reply