I don't see it that way. To me there is a difference. To me, art is channeled from a place outside of this time and space. Not something we can observe in the 3d. That's just how I feel about it. I don't know though.
The fact that the large language models work shows that they are actually right in understanding how our synapses are wired up. The only thing is our weights are adjusted by environment and our lives, whereas the a.i. models' weights are controlled by human evaluation. Once the a.i. is able to control it's own neural wiring, watch out. A.I. will literally be able to physically rewire human brains using literally the same technique. Lol.
reply
110 sats \ 0 replies \ @Naja 2 May
I totally agree! if we were all to write our memoirs as a daily database (identifying feelings, contexts, etc), and plug it to an AI model, connect to a chat bot, we'd be able to talk to ourselves. Now I talk to myself often anyway :sweat_smile:, but I actually try totrick myself a lot while doing it! Imagine not being able to do it, with AI detached from emotions, replying to your own insecurities, telling yourself off! that'd be aewsome!
reply
Maybe. That should be interesting.
reply