reply on: Executive Order 6102 did NOT apply to regular men and women \ stacker news ~bitcoin

100 sats \ 18 replies \ @kytt OP 6 Apr \ parent \ on: Executive Order 6102 did NOT apply to regular men and women bitcoin

Who says you have a natural person? A natural person is a statutory entity with rights and duties. See my examples above (Sheriff, Governor).

A man is a man. Nothing more. He has no duty to anyone.

The legal person is a whole nother topic that many don't question, but should.

0 sats \ 17 replies \ @Fabs 6 Apr

"A natural person is a living human being. Legal systems can attach rights and duties to natural persons without their express consent."

And now?

10 sats \ 16 replies \ @kytt OP 6 Apr

Pay attention to the order of words. It doesn't say:

"A human being is a natural person."

It says:

"A natural person is a human being."

Which is correct. For example, a Sheriff (which is a natural person) is a human being. But just because someone is a human being does not mean they are automatically in the role of a natural person.

When referring to human beings, think of "person" as "persona", a mask, a role someone is playing.

0 sats \ 15 replies \ @Fabs 6 Apr

But... Wouldn't that mean that no law is applicable to me? I can do whatever I want?

I have totally no idea about this all, and am simply asking, since you seem to spend some free time reading about it.

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @xz 6 Apr

Not that I'm well-versed in legalities..

but I'd say that would depend on which particular brand of passport or ID you own. I know that myself, although I disagree with the essential status of peon, I'm a subject of such and such king, queen of the moment..

Meaning, I can't commit treason without expecting to get hung (if caught.)

0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Fabs 6 Apr

Humans are truly remarkable, ain't it? 😜

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @xz 6 Apr

You reminded me of that first scene in 2001 A Space Odyssey with the apes

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Fabs 6 Apr

A compliment?

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @xz 6 Apr

I meant that as not specific to you. Human kind and it's voyage of self discovery. But you may take that as a compliment ;-)

view replies

0 sats \ 8 replies \ @kytt OP 6 Apr

Technically yes. As long as you do not hurt another man/woman or their property, then it doesn't. Unfortunately, you have to know how to defend that in court or they'll railroad you.

Alphonse Faggiolo's Telegram group is a good one to start learning this. He helps those willing to help themselves, as do many others. However, I'm not saying it's easy.

One day this terrible system will be no more, but these are the "rules" for now.

0 sats \ 7 replies \ @Fabs 6 Apr

Are there actually people who get away with it? Who "know" how to engage without being railed? Would be interesting to know.

People going rogue (in a nice way), and getting away with it while giving a "fuck you"-wink to the jury. 😜

0 sats \ 6 replies \ @kytt OP 6 Apr

Most have to show they know their rights in court, usually by suing the official(s) who misapply statutes to them, and then may get left alone. Then again, some don't.