Do not fall for it again.
Legalese is tricky for those not versed within it. Surprisingly, many (low level) judges & lawyers still do not understand the statutory construction concepts of ejusdem generis or noscitur a sociis.
Let's look at the last sentence of Section 1 of EO 6102:
The term "person" means any individual, partnership, association or corporation.
At first glance, it looks like the word "individual" would apply to an actual human being. When a definition contains a list such as this, the terms within the list must be within the same class. Human beings are not within the same class as the other commercial/statutory entities within this list, so in this case, an "individual" is just one of those other "persons".
Rarely does a person mean a human being, but it is often misapplied to us. Those that know how to fight it in court can ensure that it is not, but unfortunately, many do not have the want to learn court process and fight it.
To see when a person actually means a regular human being, look at the definition of "person" within your state's penal code.