pull down to refresh
415 sats \ 2 replies \ @zuspotirko OP 7 Apr
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GKgj9_nWgAEGzGB?format=jpg&name=900x900
reply
205 sats \ 1 reply \ @freetx 7 Apr
Related (sarc)
https://m.stacker.news/25603
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 29 Jun
Plus the crazy vs hot matrix
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Enemy_of_the_state 15 Apr
Defimately would have pumped out more had I made more money back then…
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 29 Jun
This is interesting data
Almost every cohort is below 2. Replacement level is 2.1.
We should look at females only between ages 15 and 49
Fertility vs income of female
Fertility vs age of female
Fertility vs marital status
Fertility vs religion
Fertility vs ethnicity
Long story short is that too many white women are single and childless and the married ones are having one child only. Family trees 🌲 are upside down 🙃
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 7 Apr
That's some serious stuff. And the comments down under are hilarious but so true.
Like it
reply