reply on: Bitcoin has no leaders. Soft forks do. \ stacker news ~bitcoin

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @TheBTCManual 22 Apr \ parent \ on: Bitcoin has no leaders. Soft forks do. bitcoin

Lol no one is forcing you to use it, there are options and people can make their own choices, you're using a custodial LN app right now, fedmint is just liquids model without a blockchain

Liquid isn't perfect by any means, dunk on it, don't use it, but propose a solution, because LN also isn't perfect either, very few are using it non-custodially in any case

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @pako 22 Apr

Drivechsins, ARK, Mercury, zk-Rollups, CTV's timeout trees, channel factories, Enigma Network, hell even motherfucking bigger blocks with assumeUTXO and SPV enabled nodes.

There are a gazillion proposals but you mfers are too afraid to add any new thing to Bitcoin because somehow you all think Bitcoin needs your protection.

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @TheBTCManual 22 Apr

LOL can I use that right now?

.....where's the liquitiy for moving in and out? Where's my unilateral exit? How would people interact with one another if theres no wallets, and no network to send to, then I just have to go back to the basechain or hope someone has a swap to LN and trust them.

You're pulling out things with no active product for me to use or send others to use and presenting it to me as a solution, anyways I think i'm done here, but do let me know when theres something to try out, always happy to give alternatives a go

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @pako 22 Apr

You asked for proposals, I gave them to you.

I won't ever call Liquid an L2 and would never tell a developer to "prove a use case on Liquid first", rather use Kraken than that joke of a custodian token.