reply on: Legit? — Bitcoin CoinJoin implementation with incentive structure

pull down to refresh

263 sats \ 8 replies \ @kristapsk 27 Apr \ parent \ on: Legit? — Bitcoin CoinJoin implementation with incentive structure | JoinMarket lightning

I would not call myself the author. It was designed by Chris Belcher and new version was originally written by Adam Gibson. I'm just one of maintainers and active contributor.

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @bellabaxter 28 Apr

@kristapsk, is the transition to taproot addresses planned for Joinmarket?

20 sats \ 4 replies \ @kristapsk 28 Apr

There have been discussions, but no decision has been made and nobody has proposed even PR to support taproot wallets. Only sending to P2TR is supported right now. https://github.com/JoinMarket-Org/joinmarket-clientserver/discussions/1469

21 sats \ 3 replies \ @bellabaxter 29 Apr

Thanks. As AdamISZ says taproot isn't needed for vanilla coinjoins but it could be beneficial for the privacy of people using both JM and lightning.

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Bell_curve 16 May

Can taproot replace coin join and other mixing services?

10 sats \ 1 reply \ @kristapsk 16 May

No. Taproot by itself is not a silver bullet privacy tech. Taproot just allows theoretically to do better stuff with coinjoins, etc. Actually taproot can sometimes even worsen your privacy, before there is more adoption of it.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 16 May

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/s/zRaFwivVVd

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner OP 28 Apr

Wow, I had no idea! Congratulations and thanks.

👍

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 27 Apr

Oh sorry, edited my comment quickly but not quick enough for a mention haha