pull down to refresh
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @tolee 28 Apr
Do it. How much could it cost?? Imagine the clout.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DeltaClimbs OP 28 Apr
I was just thinking it is funny and practical, haha, but yes, I do suppose there would be some clout for "establishing new lands" for commercial use or whatever (beyond just the research facilities)
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT 28 Apr
Wouldn't those bitcoin miners melt all the ice? Lol
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DeltaClimbs OP 28 Apr
We need more ocean water to boil
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @Cje95 28 Apr
There would be a huge huge issue with the Antarctic Treaty.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @DeltaClimbs OP 28 Apr
Good thing that geothermal heat is not a mineral ;)
I don't see the issue
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Cje95 28 Apr
You cant build anything there.... lol that that kinds kills it
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @DeltaClimbs OP 28 Apr
ok, hear me out, new plan... we invade and conquer Antarctica and declare it the sovereign Bitcoin Citadelarctica
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Cje95 28 Apr
Sold! Assemble the men we ride at dawn!
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Satosora 28 Apr
I guess you could get energy from this temp gradient, but what would you do with it?
Unless you get everyone and everything there, its a mute point.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @DeltaClimbs OP 28 Apr
Exactly, you have the best geothermal gradient on the planet!
Idk if we need all that many people since it's mostly about maintaining the machines, but anything that is not bandwidth intensive compute could be done there, so lots of bitcoin mining and AI.
I'm saying 1 million since some space CEO said something about 1 million humans in LEO, and I think we hit 1 million Antarctic service workers first... but you need absolutely massive infra to need that many people.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Satosora 28 Apr freebie
And who actually wants to live there.
You would be giving up a lot to live in a snowy wasteland.