> If you want to push this on principle [...]

I think it may be useful for you to reflect on the word 'want' in that sentence.

elvismercury

> I don't think it's a matter of responsibility. It's a matter of UX and introducing friction to zapping.

I think responsibility and friction are intertwined. For me, responsibility implies matters of UX and introductions of friction. 

> If you want to push this on principle, at the expense of losing a userbase, or having the zap signal be of lower quality, it's your perogative as the site owner.

I agree.

k00b

SN's wallet plans

I don't think it's a matter of responsibility. It's a matter of UX and introducing friction to zapping.

> For bitcoin to fundamentally change internet applications, I believe the applications themselves must be not-custodians. 

I agree in principle, but in my opinion, LN UX is not yet there yet, to support such a change.

If you want to push this on principle, at the expense of losing a userbase, or having the zap signal be of lower quality, it's your perogative as the site owner. 