For something like this, I wouldn't try to lock too many things down. The pragmatic question is: can you give students a tool that makes them genuinely engage with texts more? This, to me, is the key. That's the only thing I would try to measure, because everything else will distort the picture and give you a false sense of knowing anything.
If Easify (or any tool) is genuinely useful to students then they'll use it. If it isn't, they won't, not really. They'll go through the motions, and whatever you try to do to capture them, they will evade, either now, or soon.
Thank you for your comment and analysis! It’s a stunning reminder to Keep It Simple, Stupid. I will include your POV in my email to my Head of Department - her pay scale is higher haha.
I teach in the weakest-progress school in Singapore - teens who have failed their Pri Sch Leaving Exam. I wonder if they will take to reading in the first place if their teachers don’t make a concerted effort to create the conditions for reading.
reply