pull down to refresh

Just in case there’s a wave of annoying shitcoinery coming about. Downvote them out. Good or bad?

146 sats \ 2 replies \ @m4 1 Aug 2022

Imho bad. Better have option to block people and don't see their posts.

reply

Would both be helpful actually

reply

It's better to implement blocking than downvoting first imo. Downvoting is destructive

reply

Not crazy about the idea to downvote. If it were implemented, I think it should be much more expensive than upvoting. Like someone already stated, blocking is a good alternative.

reply

Who would the sats go to?

I am guessing you don't want to give them to OP.

Go to SN?

reply

If you use the new poll feature, any sats from votes or creating the poll goes towards rewards. I think that's a good option if downvotes were implemented.

reply

make the downvote cost twice as much for the same effect as an upvote

reply

downvoting is a destructive idea, and imo it should be avoided at all costs

reply

proposed: get rid of upvoting/boosting and just have downvoting/deboosting

reply